Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 5 comments | Add your own | iPod friendly | Bookmark this Facebook bookmark del.icio.us bookmark StumbleUpon bookmark Digg bookmark What is this?

Priorities need reevaluation

Published Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Since we have the same attorney general and court system as Elmore and Autauga counties, this applies to all.

Where is our sense of justice and fairness? The past few weeks, the Elmore County Courts have tried the No. 1 assistant to a man who shot and killed a man in a department store parking lot in cold blood to steal his vehicle. It could have been me, you, or anybody. The man had stopped by on his way from work to buy baby diapers. The man was unarmed and was unaware he was about to die, leaving his wife with a baby to raise.

It was a senseless, intentional and random shooting. His No. 1 assistant was tried and given 13 years with allowance for time served in jail. He will probably be out in three or four years and can get on with his life as he chooses.

In this same court, there was a man in his 20s who mentioned to someone that he had a sexual relationship with a girl who was 15 when he was 17. Two years difference in age between teenagers. He was given 30 years in prison.

He will serve many years and wear a scarlet letter as a sex offender for the rest of his life. Why don’t we require robbers and thieves to wear a sign to that effect when out in public and those convicted of DUIs to have car tags with drunk driver on it?

Isn’t somebody guilty of a crime every time a pregnant girl under 16 goes to Medicaid for medical attention? How many convictions have we had in those circumstances?

Another thing going on is these cities passing laws requiring sex offenders not to live within 2,000 feet, some places 2,600 feet, from a church, school, daycare or park. The result is there is nowhere in cities for them to live, therefore they are dumping them out in ruraly areas where law enforcement is thin. I’ll bet you don’t know there are 86 in Chilton County. Eight are in the Verbena area. Coosa has 36, Autauga has 83 and Elmore has 144, but some of those are in prison.

Alabama state law requires the sheriff to keep up with these people but does not pay the county anything to do it. The law enforcement agencies could better use their time doing other things.

Don’t get me wrong: anybody who entices or forces a pre-teen child into a sex act should be eligible for execution. They know better.

– Lee Dennis, Verbena


WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?

Bookmark and Share






Comments

Posted by travlr423 (anonymous) on September 30, 2009 at 5:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Good head liner, And the story actually got off to a pretty good start. but as it progressed i kind of got lost as to where or what it was leading up to. and it seems as if the story headed into a direction unrelated to the title and ending without an ending and not driving any point of a particular argument back home related to the headline or title. Finally the articles here are starting to fit in with the comments. being that most of the articles and comments have very little relevance to each other.

Posted by MomOf2 (anonymous) on September 30, 2009 at 6:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)

This is a letter to the editor, pure opinion, not written by anyone on the CA staff.

Posted by CrimusK8T (anonymous) on September 30, 2009 at 11:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)

"Alabama state law requires the sheriff to keep up with these people but does not pay the county anything to do it. The law enforcement agencies could better use their time doing other things."

I dont understand how the person who wrote this article can possibly feel that keeping up with sex offenders (which I believe is part of keeping the public safe) is an unpaid service?

I do not believe that their time could be better spent on other things than attempting to secure the safety and innocence of children from the threat of sexual predators.

What is a "better" use?

Now, I certainly understand that someone being sentenced to 30 years for sex between himself at 17 and another teen who was two years his junior is ridiculous-but- try to keep in mind that not all sex offenders are carrying a scarlett letter for similar acts.

Posted by travlr423 (anonymous) on September 30, 2009 at 11:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Momof2,
I believe it is pretty evident that the CA staff did not write this letter. As with many comments here including my own there is not enough misspelling to match it to the CA.
And i was under the impression that any article or comment was merely the opinion of the writer.

Posted by travlr423 (anonymous) on September 30, 2009 at 12:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Mr. Dennis,
Maybe if you have any specific arguments pertaining to the judicial system that you would like to speak about you should atten the 19th circuit meeting in the park on OCT,10TH @ 1:00 PM. or voice your opinion @ courthouseforum.com

Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:



advanced search

© 2010 The Clanton Advertiser, Inc. All rights reserved.
A Boone Newspapers Inc. publication.

Contact us | Privacy Policy